Recently, there has been a great deal of controversy on whether should rural people are letting to freely immigrate to capital ore big cities? Immigration has numerous advantages as well as disadvantages and several factors have to be considered in order to make a wise decision. Firstly, one of the most significant advantages of immigration is that talents of ingenious people that is possibility be concealed, can be discovered and utilized in the capital because of more educational facilities compare to small cities . Additionally, people are capable to get their quota and shares of modern aspects of life and use it in order to reform and promote their life style. On the other hand, it is important to remember that immigration has its disadvantages. One of the prominent demerits of immigration is over population of big cities which leads to enormous hardships and difficulties in urban life. Additionally, owing to cultural differences between these two kinds of life, a majority of immigrated people face many hardships to adapt themselves with the new life style. Furthermore, a majority of immigrated people have not enough qualification to find adequate occasions or vocations as a result they may tempt to perform unruly works to survive. Ultimately, lack of agricultural products may leads to a calamity and government have to pay expensive costs and consider remarkable budget to compensate it. Considering the aforementioned arguments, I am of the opinion that disadvantages of freely immigration outweigh the advantages, and should be limited by government. It can be reached by prohibition and restriction rules as well as improvement of welfare facilities and more social justice in villages.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document